Flaherty Seeking Inspiration from Israel
To tackle Canada's well-known challenges in commercializing R&D, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty met with officials responsible for Israel's R&D policies. Israel's approach to government funding for R&D is highly respected and has achieved outstanding results. In recent years, this funding model has helped Israel become the world leader in startups per capita.

"They've certainly achieved remarkable results, and there are aspects of Israel's approach that we should study closely—and maybe even adopt ourselves," Flaherty told reporters during a conference call.

Israel's innovation and R&D funding model puts a strong emphasis on direct funding and leverages public-private partnerships to create government funds. This ensures that the private, for-profit sector is involved at various stages, so that political priorities don't get in the way of sound innovation funding decisions.
Israel's government fund is managed by a single office, the Israeli Chief Scientist Office (CSO). The CSO operates under a 'neutrality principle' required by R&D law, meaning support goes to companies with strong technological capabilities, regardless of their sector. This single-window approach is exactly what the Jenkins report recommended for Canada's R&D funding programs to improve government accountability.

The government hasn't yet specified what changes will be made to the current $7 billion in innovation funding (which includes direct support like the Industrial Research Assistance Program (IRAP) and indirect support like the Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) program). However, Prime Minister Harper has said he will consult the Tom Jenkins report, submitted last November. The Jenkins report recommends several changes, including more direct funding—such as grants targeted at specific industries and companies. At the same time, it calls for major reforms to the broad-based, indirect SR&ED program.

So far, we know the government plans to draw on the Jenkins report and look at innovation programs from other successful countries to boost Canadian innovation. The government has hinted that Israel, Sweden, and Finland are being considered as models for government-led innovation.
"We'd be missing an opportunity if we didn't take a close look at what they're doing and see which of their strategies could work here in Canada," Flaherty said.

Related Posts

    • December 9, 2025

    Canada Doubles Down on Innovation: New $358M Defence Initiative Complements Historic SR&ED Enhancements

    • December 2, 2025

    Policy Stability Now Matters as Much as Incentive Size for R&D Investment, New Analysis Finds

    • November 14, 2025

    Boast at SaaS North 2025: Unpacking Canada’s Biggest SR&ED Win in Years